Heart Of Darkness 4 Essays - Congo Free State, Heart Of Darkness

Heart Of Darkness 4 In Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, Marlow chooses to go against his beliefs by lying to Kurtz's intended. Although Marlow feels that lies are detestable, he is justified in falsifying Kurtz's final words to the Intended. Marlow feels that there is a taint of death and a flavor of mortality in lies, comparing lying to biting into something rotten. However, much of the world is filled with deceitfulness and lying, as it is almost a custom in the man's world. Lying makes Marlow physically ill, therefore to lie would be to give up his convictions and submit to the reality that the world is characterized by lying. Outside of the men's world is the women's world, epitomized by the Ladies' Drawing Room. Here, men and women are on their best behavior and manners are crucial. Inside the Ladies' Drawing Room, there is no sense of reality, deceitfulness or selfishness, as seen in the man's world. Here, the women are ignorant to the issues in the real world. Men come to the Ladies' Drawing room to escape the harsh reality that awaits them outside. Society was dependent on the Ladies' Drawing Room as an escape from reality. Following Kurtz's death, Marlow goes to see the Intended, where she asks to hear Kurtz's final words, "The horror! The horror!" These words condemn mankind in the realization that all men have the capacity to do evil. Marlow lies to the Intended telling her that his final words were her name, which suits the ignorant, fairy tale-like world of the Ladies' Drawing Room. As Marlow referred to earlier, he hates the taint of death and the mortality of lies. Had Marlow told the Intended Kurtz's actual final words, the taint of death would have hung over the truth. Marlow escaped having to bear the weight of this truth by lying, the more moral option of the two.

How to Become a Surgical Technologist

How to Become a Surgical Technologist When you think about an operating room, you probably think of the key players we see on TV: surgeons, nurses, maybe an anesthesiologist. (And if you’re seeing it on TV, they’re probably all hopelessly glamorous, but I digress.) The key player you might not be imagining is the surgical technologist, who works with all of these medical professionals to care for patients and ensure that surgeries run smoothly. The Day-to-DayThese essential surgical team members, also known informally as â€Å"scrub techs† or â€Å"operating room techs,† are usually responsible for setting up the operating room and working with doctors and nurses throughout the procedure to manage conditions in the room. Surgical techs are usually hard at work even before the surgeon starts scrubbing in. Their tasks may include:Sterilizing the operating room and equipmentLaying out the equipment and ensuring that all necessary equipment is availablePositioning and covering the anesthetized pat ient in preparation for surgeryPreparing medications and sterile solutionsHanding equipment to surgeons and nursing staff during the operationAssisting the surgeon when necessaryDressing incisions and getting patients ready for post-op careTransferring the patient to a recovery roomRestocking and cleaning the operating roomBecause surgery can happen around the clock, particularly in a hospital, surgical techs may work night/weekend/holiday shifts outside of the regular 9-to-5 schedule. However, these shifts are fairly regular, unless an emergency surgery goes longer than anticipated. Some hospitals require that surgical technologists have â€Å"on call† shifts as well. The vast majority (approximately 70%) of surgical techs work in hospitals, though some may also work in outpatient clinics that perform surgeries.For more on what it’s like to be a surgical technologist, check out these videos:Inside Jobs: Surgical TechnologySurgical Technologist: Alisha MobleySurgical T echnologist (Dr. Kit)The RequirementsSurgical technologists typically hold an associate’s degree. Certification by the National Board of Surgical Technology and Surgical Assisting can help boost the odds of finding a job in the surgical technologist field, but is not broadly required. As of 2016, only nine states require that surgical technologists be certified: Idaho, Indiana, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. The Association of Surgical Technologists offers up-to-date information on requirements and education.The SkillsThe surgical technology field calls for a number of special skills and knowledge bases, including:Attention to detailMath and science (particularly biology)Detailed medical knowledge (including anatomy and physiology)Critical thinkingAdaptabilityOrganizational skillsCommunication skillsThis is a demanding field, and calls for nerves (and a stomach) of steel, in addition to the standard kinds of Allied Health job skills. If you faint at the sight of blood, or think shortcuts are â€Å"good enough† when it comes to cleaning, this area might not be the best choice for you.The PayThe median salary for licensed surgical technologists is $43,350 per year, or $20.84 per hour, per the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). And according to a PayScale.com survey, surgical technologists are largely â€Å"extremely satisfied† with their career choice.The OutlookThis is a field you can bank on: the BLS  expects the available surgical tech jobs to grow by more than 15% by 2024.

Book Review on ONE BIBLE MANY VOICES by S. E. Gillinham Essay

Book Review on ONE BIBLE MANY VOICES by S. E. Gillinham - Essay Example 113). Throughout this volume, Gillingham adopts an academic and postmodern approach to studying the Bible, examining its formation, interpretation and overall character. Although the vast majority of authors deal with either the Old Testament of the New, Gillingham deals with the scripture in its entirety (Traina, Bauer & Peterson 2011, p. 124). On the other hand, while other authors deal with either the interpretation or formation of the Bible, Gillingham takes on both of these topics. The aim of this paper is to provide a succinct analysis of Gillingham’s book, One Bible many voices, discovering its essence and inherent message. Gillingham’s volume integrates noteworthy elements of knowledge she acquired while undertaking a long-distance module at St. John’s College, as well as elements she learnt in a theology course at the Oxford University’s undergraduate program. According to Gillingham (1999, p. xv) the book is targeted at adults with a fairly deep interest in biblical studies or theology. From the onset, Gillingham postulates that the core of the modern day is postmodernism comingled with pluralism. She believes that such comingling should also be adopted in the study of the Bible (Gillingham 1999, pp. 4-5). In essence, she attempts to demonstrate the application of pluralism, as a prominent element of postmodernism, is useful in biblical studies. One Bible many voices consists of two segments: Plurality in the making of the Bible and Plurality in the Reading of the Bible. The initial segment consists of four chapters that delve into Gillingham’s outlook concerning the diverse albeit integrated character of the description of the Bible through diverse tests and versions adopted by different groups of people. Across the chapters, Gillingham demonstrates that both the Old and New testaments have been subjected to widespread modifications in order to produce the present version (Traina 2002, p. 219). Gillingham (1999, p. 44) presents the theological, literary and historical approaches to examining the Bible. She notes that these approaches are inherently complementary, in line with the concepts of postmodernism. Gillingham holds the opinion that no biblical text has a single inflexible meaning, and this allows for the constant creation and development of fresh interpretations. Conventionally, theology provides for a single properly controlled approach to biblical studies, arguing that the cannon itself is a crucial control (Barrick 2003, p. 113). However, Gillingham proposes diverse interpretations, opposing the establishment of controls. In fact, she poises that it is impractical to establish controls regarding the inclusion or exclusion of different books. This view opposes the existence of one authoritative cannon. For Gillingham, reading the Bible is the only sure way of understanding it. She poises that the open-ended and pluralist way of reading provides a clear picture of the essence of the B ible (Gillingham 19997, p. 72). In contradiction of the book’s title, the inference of the first segment is that no single standard biblical text, universal cannon and biblical theology exists. Gillingham introduces the second segment of the volume in alignment with the book’s title. It is in the second part that she introduces the diverse approaches to