Department of Homeland Security Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Department of Homeland Security - Essay Example The DHS uses the outdated security controls and the Internet connections that are unverified and untrustworthy (Hicks). This finding has been reported by the Inspector General’s latest report in 2013. In other words, the DHS itself is violating the mandate it has received from the government in which it is authorized to use possible and reliable resources and methods for carrying out the process of security surveillance. If it continues to use such non-verified methods, it will not be able to perform its critical role and without appropriately satisfying its role, it will instead of decreasing the cyber security threat.The reason for choosing this weakness is that the cyber security becomes more serious and grave threat than the scourge of extremism and terrorism. It s devastating impact is so severe that within a span of few minutes it can disrupt the functioning of critical infrastructure which could bring serious financial and infrastructural loss to the United States of Am erica.Using verified and trustworthy security controls and the Internet connections offer the best solution for the weakness. Before going to implement any new security protocol, it must always be ensured that it is trustworthy and authentic and has been appropriately approved by the relevant department within the DHS. In addition, if any problem occurs while operating the security controls, it must be timely reported to the concerned authority and any subsequent changes must also be duly informed to the related authorities.

Deborah Tannens But What Do You Mean Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Deborah Tannens But What Do You Mean - Essay Example I agree with Tannen’s stance on criticism. Women’s softened criticism originates in their delicate nature. Tannen rightly attributes it to their emphasis upon feelings rather than ego. Women talk to others the way they would like themselves to be talked to. On the other hand, men are straight-forward. Being rough and tough, they expect others to be rough and tough as well. They don’t realize when they are being too tough to the women because they are not women themselves. It’s just that they have never been able to feel how a woman feels when she is being talked to in a straight-forward and critical manner. I also agree to Tannen as she analyzes women’s feelings when they don’t get the same level of formality or politeness that they treat men with. I agree that quite often, women keep thanking others for â€Å"nothing†. Although a man might be trying to be gentle while responding to a woman manager’s thankyou with welcome, yet a woman may not understand that he was trying to play his part on the scale of politeness because his performance was just not up to the mark! I agree that men are stronger at arguing than women because this is what they do all the time. Although women also keep arguing among their community in their little capacity, yet their capacity does not measure equal to that of men. One reason for this may be that men fight over more crucial matters than women and are more often held accountable for their acts than women, though I disagree that women are not taken seriously if they don’t argue enough. I agree that women are more generous and eager in giving feedback while men are more reluctant and critical. What women take very seriously is an ordinary thing to men. Again, it’s the delicacy of women’s nature and the roughness of men’s that is playing a role here! The fact that men tend to bring solution to women for the problems they raise with the intention of